13 articles trouvés pour ce sujet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The product of 3 integers is -24 |
2019-11-06 |
|
Rick pose la question : This is a question on my sons pre-ap practice quiz.
I think that there is information missing (?)
The product of 3 integers is -24
The sum of 3 integers is -12
What are the 3 integers ?
This is exactly how it was written on his quiz paper.
I have wasted to much time on the internet, trying to find a
formula(s) to help him.
Please help me. Penny Nom lui répond. |
|
|
|
|
|
Prime factorization in exponent form |
2014-10-31 |
|
Emma pose la question : I need to find out how to make a prime factorization of 120 in exponential form. Penny Nom lui répond. |
|
|
|
|
|
Prime factorization |
2014-02-06 |
|
Kadeejah pose la question : Write the prime factorization of 37 in exponential form Penny Nom lui répond. |
|
|
|
|
|
What is my number? |
2009-09-18 |
|
Hanna pose la question : What is my number?
My number is a perfect square.
The only number in its prime factorization is 2.
My number is a factor of 32.
The sum of its digits is odd. Penny Nom lui répond. |
|
|
|
|
|
Exponential form |
2009-08-31 |
|
cecil pose la question : what is the exponent form 564000? Stephen La Rocque and Harley Weston lui répond. |
|
|
|
|
|
The prime factorization of one billion |
2008-11-02 |
|
Alta pose la question : The prime factorization of 1000 is 2 cubed times 5 cubed. How do you write the prime factorization of one billion using exponents? Penny Nom lui répond. |
|
|
|
|
|
Prime factorization |
2008-10-19 |
|
nick pose la question : while im doing prime factorization for one number and it cant be divided 2,3 or five so what next? Penny Nom lui répond. |
|
|
|
|
|
The square root of (18*n*34) |
2008-07-01 |
|
Peter pose la question : What is the least possible positive integer-value of n such that square root(18*n*34) is an integer? Penny Nom lui répond. |
|
|
|
|
|
The greatest common factor of two numbers |
2006-07-16 |
|
Fadwa pose la question : What is the greatest common factor(GCF) of the following algebraic expressions? 1680 and 6048
Stephen La Rocque lui répond. |
|
|
|
|
|
How many numbers are relatively prime with 250? |
2006-04-19 |
|
David pose la question : How many positive integers less than or equal to 250 are relatively prime with 250? Stephen La Rocque lui répond. |
|
|
|
|
|
How many divisors does the number 138600 have? |
2006-02-08 |
|
Joe pose la question : How many divisors does the number 138600 have? Steve La Rocque and Penny Nom lui répond. |
|
|
|
|
|
LCM |
2005-12-12 |
|
Alex pose la question : what is the LCM of 210 and 54 and the LCM of 42 and 126 Penny Nom lui répond. |
|
|
|
|
|
Primes and square roots |
2001-06-14 |
|
Paul pose la question : I have a bit of a math problem. It has to do with determining if a very large number is a prime. One method entails dividing the number by every smaller prime number. If any divide into it, it's not a prime. This would be a big job if the number was something like 400 digits long. Another way I read about was to take the square root of the number and test all the primes less than its square root. The explanation went like this: "When a number is divided by another number that is greater than its square root, the result is a number smaller than the square root. For example, the square root of 36 is 6. Dividing 36 by 2, a smaller number than 6, gives 18, a number that is larger than the square root. To prove that 37 is prime it is only necessary to divide it by primes less than 6, since if it had a prime factor greater than 6, it would have to have one less than 6 as well." I understand the explanation, up to the last sentence. I fail to see the underlying logic. Why if a prime factor exists below the square does one have to exist above the square too? The number 40 can be divided by the prime 2, a number below its square root, but no other primes can do this above its square root. Have I missed something? What's the logic here? Claude Tardif and Penny Nom lui répond. |
|
|